Sana'a - Saba:
A wave of mockery and ridicule swept through social media on the Arab street and among Zionist settlers, following the Zionist response to Iran at dawn on Saturday. Describing it as ‘lacklustre, weak and weak’.
Despite the sharp statements of Zionist officials regarding the response, the reality on the ground provoked the mockery of many, as some described the Zionist response as ‘weak and weak’ compared to the size of the devastating Iranian attack.
The Zionist enemy launched a series of airstrikes on Iran at dawn on Saturday, and explosions were heard in the Iranian capital Tehran, although there was no information about damage or casualties.
Hours after the start of the operation, which the Zionist enemy dubbed ‘Days of Response’, the enemy army announced that it had completed the attack on military targets in Iran, that all its aircraft that carried out the attack on Iran returned to their bases safely, and that the operation had achieved all its objectives.
The military spokesman for the enemy army, Daniel Hagari, said: The attack was carried out under the direction of the political level in response to the Iranian regime's attacks against Israel and its citizens.
A senior US official stated that the Zionist response to Iran is over, and asked Tehran not to respond or escalate. He stressed that if Iran decides to respond, ‘we will be fully prepared to defend Israel again and there will be serious consequences.’ He added: This should be the end of the exchange of direct strikes between Israel and Iran.
During the Zionist attack on Iran, the office of War Minister Yoav Galant published a photo of him while following up the attack and strikes on Iranian sites, and the photo showed Minister Galant watching with senior officers, an old photo unrelated to tonight's attack.
For his part, a Zionist official commented: The Zionist attack caused significant damage to Iranian ballistic missile production facilities and destroyed a number of air defence systems. Adding: ‘The Iranians failed to carry out major intercepts, and the mission was carried out and fully executed.’
For its part, Iranian media quoted informed sources as saying: Air defences dealt with small aircraft objects that attacked eastern Tehran, and that the offensive operation carried out with small aircraft objects was successfully thwarted. The air defences acted vigilantly and thwarted the attack in a timely manner, they said.
Specialists in Zionist affairs also commented on the Zionist enemy's narrative by saying: The main claim that ‘Israel’ targeted Iranian air defence systems, and thus became able to operate in Iranian airspace as in the airspace of Lebanon and Syria, is false.
The specialists added: If the false Zionist claim were true, Israel would have completed its destruction of the Iranian nuclear project and even the symbols of the state and some of its leaders.
It is noteworthy that political and military analysts in the studios of Hebrew satellite channels are required to exaggerate what happened based on what was issued by the army spokesman and speak confidently as if they were with the pilots during the bombing, which confirms a Zionist attempt to produce an image of victory and deterrence.
A large number of Zionist settler herds launched a major criticism campaign accompanied by mockery of the enemy's account of the Zionist response to Iran, publishing sarcastic comments on the nature and weakness of the response and publishing old photos to follow up the Zionist attack on Iran.
They also posted videos of the Iranian response to Israel on the 1st of October and compared it to scenes from Iran of the Zionist strikes on Iran.
Followers repeatedly commented that the Zionist response did not rise to the level of Iran's missile attack that the whole world talked about, as Iran carried out strong strikes on vital sites belonging to Israel, while the Zionist response was very limited in terms of targets and the size of losses, which raised questions about the extent of Israel's ability to impose its deterrence strategy on Iran, which has become bolder in carrying out its attacks.
Some compared this response to previous operations carried out by Israel against its regional rivals, where the response was often swift and severe in the context of its battles with Hezbollah and Yemeni forces, but dealing with Iran seems different, and it seems that Israel wanted to save its face, which was covered with dust in front of the whole world.
The Zionist website ‘Waala’ revealed that Iran was informed in advance of the Zionist strikes carried out at dawn today on the capital Tehran and other areas, amid widespread ridicule in the Zionist media about the feasibility of the limited strike.
The website said: The Zionist government sent messages through several countries to Iran on Friday before the attack it carried out, in which it demanded de-escalation, and not to respond to its strike on limited sites in Iran.
The website quoted three sources as saying: ‘The Iranians received a general clarification in advance of what will be bombed, while the US administration hopes that this is the end of the exchange of direct strikes between the two sides, hoping to reduce tension and not slide into a full-scale war.’
The sources added: The Zionist message was delivered to the Iranians on Friday via several countries several hours before the attack, and ‘the Zionists have already made it clear to the Iranians in general what they will attack and what they will not attack.’
Two additional sources said: ‘Israel warned the Iranians not to respond to the attack. They emphasised that if Iran responded, Israel would carry out another attack that would be more significant.
A senior US official denied his country's participation in the Zionist operation, but confirmed that if Iran carries out a retaliatory operation, the United States is ready to defend Israel against such an attack.
The US official added: ‘This should be the end of the exchange of direct strikes between Israel and Iran.’ ‘If Iran attacks Israel again, there will be consequences. ‘We have made that clear directly and indirectly to Iran.
The attack on Iran reverberated in Zionist media circles, amid a state of cynicism about the limited results of the bombing, which was preceded by a major campaign by the Zionist government amid the threat of a major response, ensuring a long deterrence.
The Zionist correspondent of the Zionist Kan TV channel, Roi Kais, mocked the Zionist attack on Iran, saying in a tweet on his account: ‘If I were Khamenei, I would have gone back to sleep and checked what happened in the morning.’
Zionist and international media outlets published photos and videos and falsely attributed them to the Zionist entity's aggression against Iran, but these photos are old and have nothing to do with the attacks of the last few hours.
The video clip published by these media outlets also has nothing to do with the Zionist aggression on Iran and relates to the Zionist attacks on Beirut in the past few days.
The picture shown by the enemy media in an underground bunker of the Zionist war minister, allegedly monitoring the military operation on Iran, and a picture on the screens, which turned out to be an old fire years ago, is also unrelated to the Zionist aggression on Iran.
The spokesman of the main oil refinery in Tehran denied that this refinery was targeted in the Zionist attack on targets in Iran this morning. He emphasised that the refinery is operating as usual.
He also denied any attack on Tehran's oil refining facilities. He stressed full readiness for defence and preparedness for crisis management in this refinery in anticipation of any possible incidents.
An informed Iranian source had confirmed to Iran's Tasnim news agency that ‘the Zionist army's claim of targeting 20 points in Iran is unrealistic and falls within the framework of psychological warfare, and that the number of enemy targets is much less than this.’
A wave of mockery and ridicule swept through social media on the Arab street and among Zionist settlers, following the Zionist response to Iran at dawn on Saturday. Describing it as ‘lacklustre, weak and weak’.
Despite the sharp statements of Zionist officials regarding the response, the reality on the ground provoked the mockery of many, as some described the Zionist response as ‘weak and weak’ compared to the size of the devastating Iranian attack.
The Zionist enemy launched a series of airstrikes on Iran at dawn on Saturday, and explosions were heard in the Iranian capital Tehran, although there was no information about damage or casualties.
Hours after the start of the operation, which the Zionist enemy dubbed ‘Days of Response’, the enemy army announced that it had completed the attack on military targets in Iran, that all its aircraft that carried out the attack on Iran returned to their bases safely, and that the operation had achieved all its objectives.
The military spokesman for the enemy army, Daniel Hagari, said: The attack was carried out under the direction of the political level in response to the Iranian regime's attacks against Israel and its citizens.
A senior US official stated that the Zionist response to Iran is over, and asked Tehran not to respond or escalate. He stressed that if Iran decides to respond, ‘we will be fully prepared to defend Israel again and there will be serious consequences.’ He added: This should be the end of the exchange of direct strikes between Israel and Iran.
During the Zionist attack on Iran, the office of War Minister Yoav Galant published a photo of him while following up the attack and strikes on Iranian sites, and the photo showed Minister Galant watching with senior officers, an old photo unrelated to tonight's attack.
For his part, a Zionist official commented: The Zionist attack caused significant damage to Iranian ballistic missile production facilities and destroyed a number of air defence systems. Adding: ‘The Iranians failed to carry out major intercepts, and the mission was carried out and fully executed.’
For its part, Iranian media quoted informed sources as saying: Air defences dealt with small aircraft objects that attacked eastern Tehran, and that the offensive operation carried out with small aircraft objects was successfully thwarted. The air defences acted vigilantly and thwarted the attack in a timely manner, they said.
Specialists in Zionist affairs also commented on the Zionist enemy's narrative by saying: The main claim that ‘Israel’ targeted Iranian air defence systems, and thus became able to operate in Iranian airspace as in the airspace of Lebanon and Syria, is false.
The specialists added: If the false Zionist claim were true, Israel would have completed its destruction of the Iranian nuclear project and even the symbols of the state and some of its leaders.
It is noteworthy that political and military analysts in the studios of Hebrew satellite channels are required to exaggerate what happened based on what was issued by the army spokesman and speak confidently as if they were with the pilots during the bombing, which confirms a Zionist attempt to produce an image of victory and deterrence.
A large number of Zionist settler herds launched a major criticism campaign accompanied by mockery of the enemy's account of the Zionist response to Iran, publishing sarcastic comments on the nature and weakness of the response and publishing old photos to follow up the Zionist attack on Iran.
They also posted videos of the Iranian response to Israel on the 1st of October and compared it to scenes from Iran of the Zionist strikes on Iran.
Followers repeatedly commented that the Zionist response did not rise to the level of Iran's missile attack that the whole world talked about, as Iran carried out strong strikes on vital sites belonging to Israel, while the Zionist response was very limited in terms of targets and the size of losses, which raised questions about the extent of Israel's ability to impose its deterrence strategy on Iran, which has become bolder in carrying out its attacks.
Some compared this response to previous operations carried out by Israel against its regional rivals, where the response was often swift and severe in the context of its battles with Hezbollah and Yemeni forces, but dealing with Iran seems different, and it seems that Israel wanted to save its face, which was covered with dust in front of the whole world.
The Zionist website ‘Waala’ revealed that Iran was informed in advance of the Zionist strikes carried out at dawn today on the capital Tehran and other areas, amid widespread ridicule in the Zionist media about the feasibility of the limited strike.
The website said: The Zionist government sent messages through several countries to Iran on Friday before the attack it carried out, in which it demanded de-escalation, and not to respond to its strike on limited sites in Iran.
The website quoted three sources as saying: ‘The Iranians received a general clarification in advance of what will be bombed, while the US administration hopes that this is the end of the exchange of direct strikes between the two sides, hoping to reduce tension and not slide into a full-scale war.’
The sources added: The Zionist message was delivered to the Iranians on Friday via several countries several hours before the attack, and ‘the Zionists have already made it clear to the Iranians in general what they will attack and what they will not attack.’
Two additional sources said: ‘Israel warned the Iranians not to respond to the attack. They emphasised that if Iran responded, Israel would carry out another attack that would be more significant.
A senior US official denied his country's participation in the Zionist operation, but confirmed that if Iran carries out a retaliatory operation, the United States is ready to defend Israel against such an attack.
The US official added: ‘This should be the end of the exchange of direct strikes between Israel and Iran.’ ‘If Iran attacks Israel again, there will be consequences. ‘We have made that clear directly and indirectly to Iran.
The attack on Iran reverberated in Zionist media circles, amid a state of cynicism about the limited results of the bombing, which was preceded by a major campaign by the Zionist government amid the threat of a major response, ensuring a long deterrence.
The Zionist correspondent of the Zionist Kan TV channel, Roi Kais, mocked the Zionist attack on Iran, saying in a tweet on his account: ‘If I were Khamenei, I would have gone back to sleep and checked what happened in the morning.’
Zionist and international media outlets published photos and videos and falsely attributed them to the Zionist entity's aggression against Iran, but these photos are old and have nothing to do with the attacks of the last few hours.
The video clip published by these media outlets also has nothing to do with the Zionist aggression on Iran and relates to the Zionist attacks on Beirut in the past few days.
The picture shown by the enemy media in an underground bunker of the Zionist war minister, allegedly monitoring the military operation on Iran, and a picture on the screens, which turned out to be an old fire years ago, is also unrelated to the Zionist aggression on Iran.
The spokesman of the main oil refinery in Tehran denied that this refinery was targeted in the Zionist attack on targets in Iran this morning. He emphasised that the refinery is operating as usual.
He also denied any attack on Tehran's oil refining facilities. He stressed full readiness for defence and preparedness for crisis management in this refinery in anticipation of any possible incidents.
An informed Iranian source had confirmed to Iran's Tasnim news agency that ‘the Zionist army's claim of targeting 20 points in Iran is unrealistic and falls within the framework of psychological warfare, and that the number of enemy targets is much less than this.’
